Towards 0
Your manager lets you move forward and mainly comes back at an important stage, a planned check-in or when you ask.
Follow-up measures how frequently your manager comes back to you once the assignment is under way, the direction is clear and there is no particular difficulty: let you move forward and come back at an important stage or when you ask,…
When your assignment is under way, the direction is clear and you are not facing a particular difficulty, how does your manager work?
Follow-up is not a measure of availability or of micromanagement on its own.
Follow-up measures how frequently your manager comes back to you once the assignment is under way, the direction is clear and there is no particular difficulty: let you move forward and come back at an important stage or when you ask, or come back frequently to learn about progress and check alignment. Frequency alone says nothing about what it produces: in a study of employees and their managers, frequent communication went with more favourable performance ratings when the relationship was of good quality, and with less favourable ones when it was not [1]. The axis measures the pace at which your manager comes back to you, not the reason for that pace.
Follow-up is not a measure of availability or of micromanagement on its own. Frequency does not reveal the intention, quality or usefulness of each interaction. Towards the low end, it does not describe an absent manager: letting you move forward and coming back at important stages is a way of working that the meta-analysis on autonomy support links to motivation and well-being, when it comes with choices left open and requests explained [2]. Towards the high end, it does not describe a controlling manager: coming back often can be a way of making feedback easy to obtain, which matters because asking for it carries an image cost for the person [3]. The axis describes a pace, not what it means.
Your manager lets you move forward and mainly comes back at an important stage, a planned check-in or when you ask.
Around the centre, your manager relies on identified checkpoints and remains available between them when the situation requires it. The pace is agreed rather than imposed, and it is this agreed character that sets this level apart from the two poles, more than the frequency itself.
Your manager comes back frequently to understand progress, check alignment and adjust if needed.
The axis is visible in progress reviews, status messages, milestones and requests for updates during execution. It is felt when the pace does not match what the situation calls for: closely spaced status requests on work that is progressing, or a long silence on a topic where a decision was waiting. The question specifies the absence of difficulty because that is where the habitual pace can be read; when something is blocked, managers of every kind tend to come back more often. The same pace is experienced differently depending on the relationship [1], which explains why an identical frequency can feel like support to one person and like surveillance to another. Scientific scope: the cited studies examine workplace behaviours, conditions or outcomes. They do not directly validate this preference scale or an individual PIMPmyBOSS compatibility score.
The score describes a situated preference or a perceived behaviour. It is neither a personality diagnosis, a norm nor a verdict on professional quality.
In the current engine, Follow-up is compared with Check-ins. The relationship score does not judge either level: it measures their gap on this specific pair.
Understand Check-ins × Follow-upThese publications provide context for the concepts discussed; they do not directly validate this questionnaire, its scores or its compatibility formula. An abstract does not allow every nuance of a paper to be independently checked.